You are here:--Ancient Aliens: proof of Stephen Hawking’s Claim that “Philosophy is Dead”

Ancient Aliens: proof of Stephen Hawking’s Claim that “Philosophy is Dead”

Ancient Aliens: proof of Stephen Hawking’s Claim that “Philosophy is Dead”

Note: This article was cited into the New York Times (July 22, 2018) as an counter that is intellectual the emerging religion of “Ancient Aliens.”

When you look at the book The Grand Design (2012), Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow claimed that “philosophy is dead” (p. 5). They wrote: “We exist but for a short while, and in that time explore but a tiny the main whole universe. But humans are a curious species. We wonder, we seek answers. Staying in this vast world that is by turns kind and cruel, and gazing at the immense heavens above, folks have always asked a multitude of questions: just how can we understand the world by which we find ourselves? How exactly does the universe behave? What is the nature of reality? Where d > philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not yet kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics.” (p. 5).

Needless to say, philosophy is still alive in academic journals, Amazon books, as well as the shrinking philosophy section at the Barnes & Noble bookstores. But, as a force in popular culture, contemporary philosophy is essentially dead, primarily given that it has neglected to keep pace using the discoveries in contemporary cosmology. Into the wake associated with the stunning achievements for the Apollo program while the Hubble Space Telescope (just two examples), philosophy has did not generate a popular cosmic narrative that integrates the origins and destinies of the human species into the vast and wondrous cosmos—an expanding universe stretching across 100 billion light years and populated with 2 trillion galaxies and untold amounts of stars, planets, lifeforms, and black holes. This death began with the crash of Apollo 8 and Earthrise.

This cosmic and philosophical failure is ev >2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and Interstellar (2014), Hollywood populates the expanding universe with endless monsters (ex: the Alien series) and apocalyptic warfare (ex: Star Wars), complimented by very little awe, wonder, and discovery. The Star that is recent Trek are not that distinctive from Star Wars. Here we have been fifty years after Apollo and thirty years following the Hubble telescope, additionally the dominant ideologies are nevertheless situated in cosmic narcissism and human super-specialness—pretending to be the center associated with universe or beneath the delusion that a Creator or Ancient Aliens are searching out for us.

When you look at the absence of a meaningful space philosophy, the hit television series Ancient Aliens (2010-) has hijacked the cosmic narratives from Apollo and 2001 and claims to describe humanity’s origins and destiny into the universe. In Ancient Aliens, we can see philosophy’s corpse that is mediated where an attempted space philosophy and cosmic narrative have crashed consequently they are still aflame in America on the History Channel.

Two Val >The ancient-astronaut theory draws upon two val > may have developed space travel technologies that enable them to traverse the distances that are great relative ease. at the least that’s the “wormhole” scenario depicted in Contact (1997) and Interstellar (2014) . That sa > it is highly unlikely we’ve been visited, precisely as the distances are so vast, the universe is really so gigantic, and our world is really tiny.

Yet, such a possibility (however slim) is certainly one reason why 2001 offers such a compelling vision of human origins and destinies. In the end, it might be an epochal moment to find a black monolith somewhere in the world or the moon, beaming out a radio signal to an alert and curious species. Such a possibility is very appealing to me, at least in theory. Since the astronaut Taylor says in Planet of the Apes, “Out there, there must be something better than man. Needs to be.” Of course, if ancient astronauts have visited Earth, they might have possessed technologies that are extremely advanced been viewed as gods, angels, and miracle makers by premodern humans. Just like the apes in 2001, the humans will have looked upon the technologies with fear and amazement. But have any ancient astronauts actually visited Earth?

Where’s the black monolith?

Where’s the same as the monolith that is black 2001 — that single artifact of indisputable extraterrestrial design or origin? Where may be the verifiable evidence that ancient astronauts or extraterrestrials visited our world to enlighten our species, perform great deeds, and guide our art, technology, and architecture? It’s possible some might be way more advanced and enlightened than our species, I am open to actual empirical evidence since I think extraterrestrial life forms surely exist and. Unfortunately, all of the ancient-astronaut theorists can point toward is a few mysterious artifacts, none of which can be connected to visitations that are extraterrestrial.

Where would be the “Chariots for the Gods”?

In my youth, I watched reruns or VHS tapes of 2001 and Planet associated with Apes many times, along side many other science-fiction films. I also recall viewing reruns of Chariots of the Gods and Mysteries for the Gods, which aired in the local television station. The shows are currently available on YouTube, and my viewings that are recent nearly all of my original memories of them. Both films clearly tried to connect astronauts that are ancient Apollo and space exploration, utilizing the Voyager space probe and starship Enterprise appearing early in Mysteries associated with Gods. Viewing the above films in my youth inspired me to read Chariots for the Gods?, readily available at the time in local bookstores. I viewed the films and read the book with rapt attention, precisely because von Daniken appeared to be providing “evidence” for a person narrative that was part of a larger celestial narrative outside the theism that prevailed in Texas, where I was born and was raised (in a largely secular household). Initially, this thesis was quite attractive and appeared to reflect an alternative model for human origins and possible destinies. It appeared like a attack that is plausible the cultural and historical orthodoxy associated with the age, particularly the pre-Copernican ideologies regarding the proselytizing evangelicals within my suburb.

Thesis was deeply mistaken upon later reflection, however, I found myself questioning the logic of the book’s assertions and came to realize that von Daniken’s “ancient-astronaut. The book’s flaws were exposed in a 1976 Skeptical Inquirer article as well as in a book entitled The Space Gods Revealed that featured a forward by none except that Carl Sagan.1 By 1977, Chariot regarding the Gods? was debunked in a BBC-PBS production of Nova in an episode called “The Case associated with Ancient Astronauts.”2 The episode refuted the following claims: a picture of an astronaut that is ancient carved on a Mayan sarcophagus, the Nazca Lines in Peru were originally an ancient-astronaut spaceport, ancient astronauts inspired various carvings on Peruvian stones, and ancient astronauts built the pyramids in Egypt plus the Moai statues on Easter Island.

The above assertions are one of the most ludicrous and illogical interpretations of human artifacts created by the ancient-astronaut theorists, and all are wholly unproven. In several ways, the series is an attack on logic, rationality, as well as the nature of ev >Ancient Aliens has been on television for seven seasons suggests you can find sizable audiences who are quite gullible, struggling to think logically, and scientifically illiterate. Plus, you can find irresponsible and intellectually bankrupt television programmers, but that is nothing new either.

Within the wake of the Trump pres >Chariots associated with the Gods? and Ancient Aliens, practically all for the so-called ev >never be solved.

Almost all the claims of extraterrestrial influence made on Ancient Aliens assume that human consciousness and civilization have little creativity, originality, or capacity to innovate. The basic idea is that, without the help of the ancient astronauts, humans could be helpless and could never build such great structures or make profound scientific discoveries. Plus, the show assumes there is no available room for chance, surprise, emergence, singularities, or some of the insights of chaos and complexity theory. In the end, the series represents an assault on rationality and scientific methods, not unlike all other paranormal movies and tv shows.

By | 2019-09-05T12:49:27+00:00 September 5th, 2019|Categories: Write A Paper For Me|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment